<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Korea Heavyweights Among the World&#8217;s Best Companies</title>
	<atom:link href="http://ratemyhagwon.com/2009/10/05/korea-heavyweights-among-the-worlds-best-companies/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://ratemyhagwon.com/2009/10/05/korea-heavyweights-among-the-worlds-best-companies/</link>
	<description>+ the Latest News, Jobs, and Culture in Korea</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 15:17:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sombat</title>
		<link>http://ratemyhagwon.com/2009/10/05/korea-heavyweights-among-the-worlds-best-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-928</link>
		<dc:creator>Sombat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2011 21:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ratemyhagwon.com/?p=5451#comment-928</guid>
		<description>So &quot;A commitment to innovation, diversified portfolios, aggressive expansion, strong leadership, and a clear vision for the future&quot; makes a company a world&#039;s best company?  All that tells me is that it is a successful company or a profit machine.  

GE is able to make billions without spending a penny on taxes.  Does that make it a &quot;best&quot; company?  

The classification of &quot;best&quot; needs to be better articulated and more specific in category.  

Personally, I would consider Google or Turner to be one of the best companies to work for.  Not only do they bank, but the employees actually enjoy working there.  

What about companies that significantly give back to the community?  

I saw a lot of protests outside Chung-Ang University that might throw a wet blanket on the category of best.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So &#8220;A commitment to innovation, diversified portfolios, aggressive expansion, strong leadership, and a clear vision for the future&#8221; makes a company a world&#8217;s best company?  All that tells me is that it is a successful company or a profit machine.  </p>
<p>GE is able to make billions without spending a penny on taxes.  Does that make it a &#8220;best&#8221; company?  </p>
<p>The classification of &#8220;best&#8221; needs to be better articulated and more specific in category.  </p>
<p>Personally, I would consider Google or Turner to be one of the best companies to work for.  Not only do they bank, but the employees actually enjoy working there.  </p>
<p>What about companies that significantly give back to the community?  </p>
<p>I saw a lot of protests outside Chung-Ang University that might throw a wet blanket on the category of best.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael A. Robson</title>
		<link>http://ratemyhagwon.com/2009/10/05/korea-heavyweights-among-the-worlds-best-companies/comment-page-1/#comment-889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael A. Robson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Nov 2010 03:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://ratemyhagwon.com/?p=5451#comment-889</guid>
		<description>Awesome. Fighting! These are great companies, just hope those working for Hyundai/Samsung etc are doing well, and not exploited. I&#039;ve heard working for those big companies is pretty brutal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Awesome. Fighting! These are great companies, just hope those working for Hyundai/Samsung etc are doing well, and not exploited. I&#8217;ve heard working for those big companies is pretty brutal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

